Pupil Premium Strategy Statement – Brookfield Community School
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils. It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
|
Detail |
Data |
|
School name |
Brookfield School |
|
Number of pupils in school |
1851 |
|
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
13.8% |
|
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2024/2025 to 2026/2027 |
|
Date this statement was published |
December 2025 |
|
Date on which it will be reviewed |
December 2026 |
|
Statement authorised by |
Stuart Parkes, Headteacher |
|
Pupil premium lead |
Rachel Jones, Director of Learning |
|
Governor / Trustee lead |
Martin Wright |
Funding overview
|
Detail |
Amount |
|
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£283,000 |
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year |
Recovery Premium: £0 Catch Up Funding: £0 |
|
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
|
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£283,000 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
At Brookfield School, our mission statement of ‘Aspire, Act, Achieve’ applies equally to every one of our students, irrespective of their background or the challenges they face. Our aim is that all of our staff, working in partnership with parents and carers and external agencies will provide opportunities and support to enable our students to make good progress and achieve their potential across the curriculum. In addition to this, our school-wide focus on helping students to display our Brookfield Characteristics of Self-confidence, Resilience, Kindness, Leadership and Respectfulness will ensure that they are prepared and able to look forward to their next steps beyond Brookfield.
We regularly remind ourselves that excellent teaching for all students has a particular benefit for disadvantaged students (evidence from EEF research) and this can be seen in the high expectations in classrooms across the school. High-quality teaching is at the heart of our whole school approach, with a focus on areas in which disadvantaged pupils require the most support.
We collect progress data at regular intervals and analyse this data thoroughly to ensure that appropriate ‘catch-up’ interventions are swiftly put into place. These interventions may involve both disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged students. Our approach will be responsive to common challenges and individual needs, rooted in robust diagnostic assessment, not assumptions about the impact of disadvantage.
The quality of relationships between staff and vulnerable students is strong. This is demonstrated by the fact that we know our students well and do everything we can to remove barriers to engagement. We ensure that our disadvantaged students are prepared for their next steps after Brookfield.
This strategy document links closely with our whole school action plan. The activities we have outlined in this statement are also intended to support the needs of young people with a social worker or who are young carers, regardless of whether they are disadvantaged or not.
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
|
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
|
1 Reading |
Assessments, observations and discussion with KS3 pupils indicate that disadvantaged pupils generally have lower levels of reading comprehension than their peers. This impacts their progress in all subjects. In the academic year 2024/25, 43% of our disadvantaged pupils joined us with below age-related expectations in Reading, compared to 17% of the full year 7 cohort. |
|
2 Attainment |
Our key priorities for 2024/25, based on thorough analysis of our 2024 GCSE results are:
|
|
3 Social and Emotional Well-being |
Our assessments, observations and discussions with pupils and families have identified social and emotional issues for many pupils, such as family relationship issues, anxiety and low mood. These challenges particularly affect disadvantaged pupils, including their attainment. We are also noticing a lack of resilience in many of our young people. The number of referrals for our internal mental health provision and for our commissioned counselling support have noticeably increased this academic year. |
|
4 Attendance |
Our attendance data over the last 3 years indicates that attendance among disadvantaged pupils has been 5-10% lower than for non-disadvantaged pupils. 45% of disadvantaged pupils have been ‘persistently absent’ compared to 19% of their peers during that period. While these are inline with national figures, our assessments and observations indicate that absenteeism is negatively impacting disadvantaged pupils’ progress. |
|
5 Wider school engagement |
Our internal data on disadvantaged pupils’ engagement in co-curricular activities shows that similar numbers of disadvantaged/non-disadvantaged students sign up in the lower years, but that engagement declines at KS4. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
|
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
|
Improved reading fluency and comprehension among disadvantaged pupils. |
For students participating in the ‘Thinking Reading’ intervention programme, data shows that the gap between their reading age and their chronological age is decreasing quickly. Teachers should also have recognised this improvement through engagement in lessons and book scrutiny. The first cohort of students on the Corrective Reading comprehension programme will show improved levels of reading comprehension which will be evident in all literacy based subjects and lead to improved assessment results and overall attainment. |
|
Improved attainment among disadvantaged pupils across the curriculum at the end of KS4 |
By the end of our current plan in 2026/27, KS4 outcomes demonstrate that disadvantaged pupils continue to make progress that places them in the top quartile of secondary schools in Hampshire local authority. |
|
To achieve and sustain improved wellbeing for all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged. |
Sustained high levels of wellbeing demonstrated by qualitative data from student voice, student and parent surveys and teacher observations. |
|
To achieve and sustain improved attendance for all pupils, particularly our disadvantaged pupils. |
Sustained high attendance demonstrated by:
|
|
To achieve regular engagement in co-curricular activity for our pupils, including those who are disadvantaged. |
By the end of our current plan, a greater percentage of our disadvantaged students will attend at least one co-curricular activity each week. |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £85,000
|
Activity must align with EEF menu of approaches |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Recruitment of highly skilled subject specialists. We were fully staffed with subject specialists in September 2024. |
Supporting the Attainment of Disadvantaged Pupils (DfE, 2015) suggests high quality teaching as a key aspect of successful schools. |
1, 2 |
|
High quality teaching across the school based on the principles of data driven instruction; departments have clear processes for support before and after assessments. |
Supporting the Attainment of Disadvantaged Pupils (DfE, 2015) suggests high quality teaching as a key aspect of successful schools. |
2 |
|
Develop Metacognitive and Self-regulation skills for all students. In September 2024 we had a full INSET day’s training on Metacognition as this is a key area of focus for staff CPD this year. We have agreed a common language to be used by staff and students when talking about learning and this is becoming embedded across the school. All staff are involved in carousel groups which provide opportunities to explore and trial specific teaching strategies around the theme of metacognition, initially starting with Modelling, Checking for Understanding and Feedback. Progress in these areas is then tracked and monitored through our system of Instructional Coaching. |
Teaching metacognitive strategies, and regularly reviewing key learning is supported by the Education Endowment Foundation as having a positive impact on learning |
2 |
|
We offer excellent provision for ECTs, including 1:1 mentoring from a Lead Practitioner in year 2 of their ECT programme. |
||
|
We have a strong team of experienced Middle Leaders. Regular Middle Leader meetings focus on a defined set of key areas for example driving forwards our work on metacognition, and Adaptive Teaching/supporting SEN learners. |
2 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £71,000
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Additional 1:1 and small group Maths and English tuition, delivered by highly skilled tutors, focussing on year 7 students who were below ARE at the end of KS2 and year 11 students at the 3/4 and other key grade boundaries. A significant proportion of the pupils who receive tutoring will be disadvantaged. |
Evidence indicates that one to one tuition can be effective, delivering approximately five additional months’ progress on average. (EEF 2020) |
2, 3 |
|
Recruitment of a new English teacher to provide capacity for additional intervention. Any extra Maths and English staff capacity is used to provide intervention sessions for students supported by our Phoenix Centre. |
Evidence indicates that one to one tuition can be effective, delivering approximately five additional months’ progress on average. (EEF 2020) |
|
|
Continue to use Thinking Reading to ensure that all students have a reading age which at least matches their chronological age - this is a 1:1 reading intervention programme designed to quickly improve reading fluency and enable students to catch up so that their reading age matches their chronological age. We will aim to have ‘caught up’ students in all year groups by the end of the Autumn term 2025 and our focus will then shift to the new year 7 intake each year, and any mid-year admissions. |
Evidence shows that behaviour and mental health issues can follow as a consequence of low reading ability. ‘Thinking Reading’ is a well respected evidence-based intervention programme. |
1,2 |
|
In Spring 2024, we will introduce ‘Corrective Reading’ a small group intervention based on the principles of Direct Instruction, either as a follow on programme for students who have graduated from Thinking Reading, or for students whose reading test scores demonstrate that they are able to decode fluently, but with comprehension. A significant proportion of students on both the Thinking Reading and Corrective Reading programmes will be disadvantaged. |
‘Corrective Reading’ is an evidence-based intervention, based on the principles of Direct Instruction. |
1,2 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £127,000
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Comprehensive careers programme where Disadvantaged students are prioritised for 1:1 careers appointments and to attend external careers fairs in years 8 and 9. |
An EEF report (2016) found that: Careers education works best when it is personalised and targeted to individuals’ needs from an early age. This, together with school-mediated employer engagement alongside independent and impartial career guidance, is key to supporting young people’s transitions into education, training and employment. Young people who have a good understanding of what they need to do in school to achieve their career ambitions, and who combine part-time work with full-time study, do a lot better economically later in life than their peers. |
2,3,4 |
|
Remove barriers to opportunities which provide cultural capital e.g by fully funding places for Disadvantaged students on all school theatre trips. We run a weekly year 7 enrichment/cultural capital group which provides a wide range of co-curricular opportunities for disadvantaged students, including strong links with our school governors and the local community. This is led by a member of our Disadvantaged staff team. |
3 |
|
|
We run regular parenting sessions (approx.10 per year) led by an experienced specialist practitioner focussing on a wide range of issues including positive discipline, dealing with worry and anxiety, social media use and peer pressure. House Leaders, the SENCO and PSOs will refer parents to these sessions where families would benefit from additional support in these areas. |
The EEF Teaching and Learning toolkit states that ‘parental engagement has a positive impact on average of 4 months’ additional progress. It is crucial to consider how to engage with all parents to avoid widening attainment gaps’. |
3 |
|
Increased attendance % for disadvantaged pupils through the enlargement of the Attendance Team |
Increasing the capacity of the Attendance team so that they can engage with the families of those pupils who are persistently absent, alongside supporting the pastoral and teaching staff to develop a culture of good attendance, is supported through the recommendations in the government guidance: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-attendance/framework-for-securing-full-attendance-actions-for-schools-and-local-authorities The DfE guidance has been informed by engagement with schools that have significantly reduced persistent absence levels. |
4 |
|
We have proactively sought additional support from external agencies which is suitable for students (and their families) on the CAMHS waiting list, and those who just fall below the threshold for CAMHS support. |
This is necessary as there are generally more complex needs across the school. |
3 |
|
Increase participation in co-curricular activities; our co–curricular lead has produced sign-up lists for tutors so they are aware of which disadvantaged students in their PD groups have not signed up for any clubs, enabling them to target discussions with these students and encourage attendance. |
Historically we have seen a close correlation between those pupils who actively engage in the wider offer the school provides and those who attain or exceed their target grades, including our disadvantaged pupils. With the appointment of a co-curricular lead, this internal school research has become more accurate and will enable a more targeted approach at ensuring participation. |
5 |
|
Develop and increase the capacity of our breakfast club to include greater numbers of disadvantaged students. Target younger students to develop a culture of attendance at this club throughout their time at Brookfield. |
Breakfast positively affects children’s behaviour and school performance. Initiatives such as this aim to support levelling up children`s outcomes in providing better nutrition, and improved wellbeing, behaviour and social skills. |
2,3,4 |
|
Sustained pastoral provision and welfare support for disadvantaged pupils. Recent changes to the pastoral support office/student reception processes to give additional capacity and a quiet space to provide immediate and pre-arranged support to vulnerable students. |
Post-pandemic, we have seen an increase in the need for welfare support for many of our pupils, but particularly our most vulnerable and disadvantaged pupils. |
3 |
|
Develop a robust programme of support for students who are young carers. A member of the disadvantaged team will oversee this area and will ensure that these students are identified, and that appropriate support is provided during their time at Brookfield. |
The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Young Carers has cautioned that many students who are young carers were not being identified at school, leading to inconsistent support and decreased academic outcomes. |
3 |
|
Reviewing the impact of our disadvantaged initiatives, starting with breakfast club and the year 7 enrichment group. We will analyse pre and post surveys designed by Impact Ed to ensure that these provisions are meeting the needs of our students and make changes where needed. |
3,4 |
|
|
Significant support provided for students on the FSM register, including those who are just below the FSM qualification threshold, who need additional financial help in order to have equal access to the curriculum. |
2,3,4 |
|
|
Continue to ensure that student leadership and student voice includes representation from our disadvantaged students. We will aim to remove any barriers that prevent students from applying for the role. |
Student voice and student leadership raises aspirations and can contribute to the continued development of progress of the school. Student leaders are seen as role models for the wider school. |
5 |
|
To continue to develop links with community partners to support students and their families – eg. Tesco, Waypoint Church, St Margaret Mary Church |
Community partnerships to support health and wellbeing for students and their families. Happy and healthy communities support the foundation for positive education at school. |
3 |
|
Contingency fund for acute issues. |
Based on our experiences and those of similar schools to ours, we have identified a need to set a small amount of funding aside to respond quickly to needs that have not yet been identified. |
2,3,4 |
Total budgeted cost: £283,000
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2023 to 2024 academic year.
|
Areas of success in 2023/24 include:
The attainment data for our disadvantaged students was much improved in Summer 2024. We are delighted that our progress figure places us 6th in Hampshire. There was a significant fall in the percentage of students who did not sit a full suite of qualifications. The students who did not have all slots filled all had significant family, academic or mental health issues and had received a high level of support throughout their time at Brookfield. Attainment
Reading
Social and Emotional Well-being
Careers Support
Areas that we continue to embed include: Attendance
Wider strategies
|
Downloads
| Page Downloads |
|---|
| Brookfield Community School - Pupil Premium Statement |