Pupil Premium Strategy Statement – Brookfield Community School
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils. It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
|
Detail |
Data |
|
School name |
Brookfield School |
|
Number of pupils in school |
1851 |
|
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
13.8% |
|
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2024/2025 |
|
Date this statement was published |
December 2025 |
|
Date on which it will be reviewed |
December 2026 |
|
Statement authorised by |
Stuart Parkes, Headteacher |
|
Pupil premium lead |
Rachel Jones, Director of Learning |
|
Governor / Trustee lead |
Martin Wright |
Funding overview
Detail |
Amount |
|
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£294,663 |
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year |
Recovery Premium: £0 Catch Up Funding: £0
|
|
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
|
Total budget for this academic year |
£294,663 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
|
At Brookfield School, our mission statement of ‘Aspire, Act, Achieve’ applies equally to every one of our students, irrespective of their background or the challenges they face. Our aim is that all of our staff, working in partnership with parents, carers and external agencies will provide opportunities and support to enable our students to make good progress and achieve their potential across the curriculum. In addition to this, our school-wide focus on helping students to display our Brookfield Characteristics of Self-confidence, Resilience, Kindness, Leadership and Respectfulness will ensure that they are prepared and able to look forward to their next steps beyond Brookfield.
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
|
1 Reading |
Assessments, observations and discussion with KS3 pupils indicate that disadvantaged pupils generally have lower levels of reading comprehension than their peers. This impacts their progress in all subjects. |
|
2 Attainment |
Our key priorities for 2025/26, based on thorough analysis of our 2025 GCSE results are:
|
|
3 Social and Emotional Well-being |
Our assessments, observations and discussions with pupils and families have identified social and emotional issues for many pupils, such as family relationship issues, anxiety and low mood. These challenges particularly affect disadvantaged pupils, including their attainment. We are also noticing a lack of resilience in many of our young people. |
|
4 Attendance |
Our attendance data over the last 3 years indicates that attendance among disadvantaged pupils has been 5-10% lower than for non-disadvantaged pupils. |
|
5 Wider school engagement |
Our internal data on disadvantaged pupils’ engagement in co-curricular activities shows that similar numbers of disadvantaged/non-disadvantaged students sign up in the lower years, but that engagement declines at KS4. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
|
Improved reading fluency and comprehension among disadvantaged pupils. |
For students participating in the ‘Thinking Reading’ intervention programme, data shows that the gap between their reading age and their chronological age is decreasing very quickly. |
|
Improved attainment among disadvantaged pupils across the curriculum at the end of KS4 |
By the end of our current plan in 2026/27, KS4 outcomes demonstrate that disadvantaged pupils continue to make progress that places them in the top quartile of secondary schools in Hampshire local authority. |
|
To achieve and sustain improved wellbeing for all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged. |
Sustained high levels of wellbeing demonstrated by qualitative data from student voice, student and parent surveys and teacher observations. |
|
To achieve and sustain improved attendance for all pupils, particularly our disadvantaged pupils. |
Sustained high attendance demonstrated by:
|
|
To achieve regular engagement in co-curricular activity for our pupils, including those who are disadvantaged. |
By the end of our current plan, a greater percentage of our disadvantaged students will attend at least one co-curricular activity each week. |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £88,200
Activity must align with EEF menu of approaches |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Recruitment of highly skilled subject specialists. We were fully staffed with subject specialists in September 2025. |
Supporting the Attainment of Disadvantaged Pupils (DfE, 2015) suggests high quality teaching as a key aspect of successful schools. |
1, 2 |
|
High quality teaching across the school based on the principles of data driven instruction; departments have clear processes for support before and after assessments. |
Supporting the Attainment of Disadvantaged Pupils (DfE, 2015) suggests high quality teaching as a key aspect of successful schools. |
2 |
|
Develop Metacognitive and Self-regulation skills for all students. We are currently in the second year of a whole school focus on Metacognition. In the academic year 2024/5 we agreed a common language to be used by staff and students when talking about learning and this is now well embedded across the school. Our specific area of focus this year is on Oracy. |
Teaching metacognitive strategies, and regularly reviewing key learning is supported by the Education Endowment Foundation as having a positive impact on learning |
2 |
|
We offer excellent provision for ECTs, including 1:1 mentoring from a Lead Practitioner in year 2 of their ECT programme. |
|
|
|
We have a strong team of experienced Middle Leaders. Regular Middle Leader meetings focus on a defined set of key areas for example driving forwards our work on metacognition, and Adaptive Teaching/supporting SEN learners. |
|
2 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £73,500
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Additional 1:1 and small group Maths and English tuition, delivered by highly skilled tutors, focussing on year 7 students who were below ARE at the end of KS2 and year 11 students at the 3/4 and other key grade boundaries. |
Evidence indicates that one to one tuition can be effective, delivering approximately five additional months’ progress on average. (EEF 2020)
|
2, 3 |
|
Continue to use Thinking Reading to ensure that all students have a reading age which at least matches their chronological age - this is a 1:1 reading intervention programme designed to quickly improve reading fluency and enable students to catch up so that their reading age matches their chronological age. We will aim to have ‘caught up’ students in all year groups by the end of the Spring term 2026 and our focus will then shift to the new year 7 intake each year, and any mid-year admissions. |
Evidence shows that behaviour and mental health issues can follow as a consequence of low reading ability. ‘Thinking Reading’ is a well respected evidence-based intervention programme. |
1,2 |
|
All year 9 students completed a reading assessment in October 2025. In Spring/Summer 2026 we will introduce a targeted intervention programme to tackle issues with reading comprehension and inference. Many of the students involved in this programme will be disadvantaged.
|
We will ensure that our chosen comprehension intervention programme is an evidence-based intervention, based on the principles of Direct Instruction.
|
1,2 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £132,300
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Comprehensive careers programme where Disadvantaged students are prioritised for 1:1 careers appointments and to attend external careers fairs in years 8 and 9. |
An EEF report (2016) found that: |
2,3,4 |
|
Remove barriers to opportunities which provide cultural capital e.g by fully funding places for Disadvantaged students on all school theatre trips. |
|
3 |
|
We run regular parenting sessions (approx. 6 per year) led by an experienced specialist practitioner focussing on a wide range of issues including positive discipline, dealing with worry and anxiety, social media use and peer pressure. |
The EEF Teaching and Learning toolkit states that ‘parental engagement has a positive impact on average of 4 months’ additional progress. It is crucial to consider how to engage with all parents to avoid widening attainment gaps’. |
3 |
|
Increased attendance % for disadvantaged pupils through the enlargement of the Attendance Team |
Increasing the capacity of the Attendance team so that they can engage with the families of those pupils who are persistently absent, alongside supporting the pastoral and teaching staff to develop a culture of good attendance, is supported through the recommendations in the government guidance: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-attendance/framework-for-securing-full-attendance-actions-for-schools-and-local-authorities |
4 |
|
We have proactively sought additional support from external agencies which is suitable for students (and their families) on the CAMHS waiting list, and those who just fall below the threshold for CAMHS support. |
This is necessary as there are generally more complex needs across the school.
|
3 |
|
Increase participation in co-curricular activities; our co–curricular lead has produced sign-up lists for tutors so they are aware of which disadvantaged students in their PD groups have not signed up for any clubs, enabling them to target discussions with these students and encourage attendance. |
Historically we have seen a close correlation between those pupils who actively engage in the wider offer the school provides and those who attain or exceed their target grades, including our disadvantaged pupils. With the appointment of a co-curricular lead, this internal school research has become more accurate and will enable a more targeted approach at ensuring participation. |
5 |
|
Implement a 1:1 mentoring programme for a group of disadvantaged year 10 students whose attainment, progress and behaviour will be monitored closely throughout years 10 and 11. This will involve close communication with parents/carers, their teachers and pastoral staff and will be led by a member of the disadvantaged team. |
|
2,3,4 |
|
Sustained pastoral provision and welfare support for disadvantaged pupils. Changes to the pastoral support office/student reception processes will give additional capacity and a quiet space to provide immediate and pre-arranged support to vulnerable students. |
With the rising cost of living and other challenges, we have seen an increase in the need for welfare support for many of our pupils, but particularly our most vulnerable and disadvantaged pupils. |
3 |
|
Continue to develop robust programme of support for students who are young carers. A member of the disadvantaged team will oversee this area and will ensure that these students are identified, and that appropriate support is provided during their time at Brookfield. |
The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Young Carers has cautioned that many students who are young carers were not being identified at school, leading to inconsistent support and decreased academic outcomes. |
3 |
|
Significant support provided for students on the FSM register, including those who are just below the FSM qualification threshold, who need additional financial help in order to have equal access to the curriculum. |
|
2,3,4 |
|
Continue to ensure that student leadership and student voice includes representation from our disadvantaged students. We will aim to remove any barriers that prevent students from applying for the role. |
Student voice and student leadership raises aspirations and can contribute to the continued development of progress of the school. Student leaders are seen as role models for the wider school.
|
5 |
|
To continue to develop links with community partners to support students and their families – eg. Tesco, Waypoint Church, St Margaret Mary Church |
Community partnerships to support health and wellbeing for students and their families. Happy and healthy communities support the foundation for positive education at school. |
3 |
|
Contingency fund for acute issues. |
Based on our experiences and those of similar schools to ours, we have identified a need to set a small amount of funding aside to respond quickly to needs that have not yet been identified. |
2,3,4 |
Total budgeted cost: £294,000
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our Pupil Premium activity had on pupils in the 2024 to 2025 academic year.
|
In Summer 2025, for Attainment 8, the ranking for the disadvantaged cohort was equal to the cohort as a whole (15/68 schools in Hampshire) – this is a significant improvement from 2023. The progress of disadvantaged students is driven by the individual students in the cohort, so is naturally variable year on year.
Reading
Social and Emotional Well-being
Careers Support
Areas that we continue to embed include:
Reading
Wider strategies
|
Downloads
| Page Downloads |
|---|
| Brookfield Community School - Pupil Premium Statement |